Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I watched that whole video the CA State govt is a SCAM adding ‘rules’ to registration and calling them a LAW under the guise of ‘registration’ to be able to claim someone is in violation of registration, when clearly the person DID register and it was some MADE UP RULE under registration used to convict the person. You can not just ‘add rules’ for travel and say someone failed registration when the person clearly DID register Which is STATED in the 290 NAME ADDRESS CAR….

Before all the travel additions the registry was to know where you lived and to keep tabs on you. In person registry is the exact same for more than a decade and had not changed until the huge list of additions to the registry. So the form to confirm your address registration is suddenly, without any additional instructions, used to add a list of additional requirements that have nothing to do with where you live and your phone number. The form confirming your information is suddenly, after over a decade of being the exact same, a form to notify you of changes as well as confirm you have not moved and all your information is correct and up to date. So you can do your best, confirm in person every year, but now you have to keep track of court room issues that 7 year law degreed professionals and lifetime legal professionals such as attorneys lawyers etc can not even understand and take up enormous amount of time trying to decipher. And now registering interstate is a huge issue nevermind international travel. And so you go on a boat that goes to international waters and stops but you do not get off, is this international travel? How is this different than a plane that goes over international air or refuels on a way but you do not leave the plane, what danger does a person pose on the plane or boat that is different in international waters and how is being placed on public registries for traveling interstate not continued punishment or at least an infringement on constitutional rights.How many people who took a plea prior to these expo facto additions to the registry would take the same plea now? So how does signing the confirmation of your residency information change to notification of extra paperwork that could be a felony charge without ever providing notice the form would become your notification of law. The evidence that the registry serves no protection to the public is there and the reports that the registry harms all the family members is also there so every politician supporting the registry know knowingly supports violating the constitution and harming a great number of children from the consequences of the registry as well as our country’s constitution. The true people benefiting from the suffering of children injured are the ones effected by the isolation and bullying the registry needlessly and pointlessly causes. For the opportunity ot spread fear from false information and then claim the registry industry is the solution while it is really a profiting industry raised from the spread of false information, this politicians harm more children and the courts that ignore the facts and research harm more children to continue the profiting registration industry. Spreading false fear, grandstanding to be a protector against non existent boogie men for profit while harming more children and families than all the crimes of the registrants combined, who are profiting off the harming our communities. The man clearly did not intentionally violate the registry, it was a new thing to follow that is buried in a list. We all sign things without reading every tiny paragraph knowing that singing the forms are not an option if you want the lease, or want the credit card or want the mortgage or want to stay out of jail. There is absolutely no indication this man new his registry requirements had so dramatically changed.Becuase of a forced signature on a form that had not changed for decades this person is in jail over a clerical issue and not knowing the rules that the courts continue to fight over. It seems clear common sense is not allowed in the court rooms, facts and studies are worth far less than the need to be popular in our branches of government and treating the constitution as applicable when it is convenient is our present and future. How do you all not get so sad by this? It was a half life we dragged ourself through with hope but now that all the studies are there and available and the registry is shown to help no one but the courts and legislatures and politicians still continue to make it worse and worse on the registry………

California is very discreet about how they do things, A lot of the registry conditions, laws and requirements were all finalize behind closed doors and after hours.
California politicians like to make registrants feel like once they’re off probation/parole they can get on with their lives BUT the truth is behind closed doors The state of California is doing everything they can to destroy your life, Not only that registrants in California are all under surveillance constantly being monitored they don’t knock on your door no more for compliance checks and if they do, it’s only because you live in a really nice neighborhood, Apartment building or gated community, this is their flush tactic by coming to your door in full swat gear scaring your neighbors, in hopes the apartment building and all the tenants apply enough pressure to force you to move, Because once any registration starts moving around their more easy to snag with the 290 violation.
This all goes back to the “compliance checks” The reason why these compliance checks are so important to pay attention to is because California 290pc pretty much gives them the power to do whatever they want, like this one I signed my initials next to 296.(b) says I have to submit to them anytime they ask regardless of how many times I have completed the process I have to go down to the station and submit, Well once I’m at the station submitting I’m pretty sure they can come up with some more BS to detain me if they wanted to.

Prosecutor: “His prior conviction puts him on notice that he is subject to an ongoing registration regime.” That sounds a lot like being subject to ongoing punishment, to me. Yes, it IS a “regime,” all right!

If you ever wondered why they ask you to put a check mark in a box next to dozens of statements on your registration form, this case should answer that question. It all comes down to “notice”” given to the registrant and makes the case that the registrant’s acts were committed with “mens rea” or “guilty conscience or knowledge.” In other words, you’re assisting them in the prosecution of your future-self for disobeying one of their criminal/civil laws by checking those little boxes and initialling them. When you check that box without reading it first, which I frequently didn’t do myself, you are giving them ammo to use against you in the future but, of course, you are given no choice but to do so. So, better to read the damned thing. Our time means nothing, after all. They’ve already made the decision to waste our entire lives jumping through whatever flaming hoops they put before us.

Also, the Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals seems like it has gone downhill since Judge Alex Kozinski’s ouster for sexual harassment. So, fantastic defender of civil liberties, on the one hand, got a little “handsy” and verbally harrassive with the law clerks, on the other. Hmmm…. tough choice!

Still amazing to me that we have this huge package of rules/regs which are being imposed on a very large number of citizens across the US by the Federal government, and yet they make virtually no effort to notify anyone affected by the rules/regs of the requirements. Instead, they rely on a hodgepodge of jurisdictions managing registration on a state/local level to notify as they see fit.

If the Feds were so concerned about all affected sex offenders complying with the rules & regs, then they could easily send a certified letter to each and every one to notify in plain English what is required. Pretty simple because they have all our addresses on file thanks to their beloved registries.

The fact that the Feds have failed to provide such notification, in plain language and in a timely manner, indicates to me that gaining compliance with the rules is not their goal. Rather, their goal appears to be enabling them to snag as many people in their net as possible for future arrest & imprisonment.

The federal and states need to publish “Welcome to being a registered citizen” handbooks with every law applicable written and actual active conact information that provide clarity and step by step process.. Only way I find out if new laws apply to me is only yearly during my annual, and its just vague briefings that change yearly.. can’t be near a park, now I can.. Can’t be near a private daycare, now I can… its like the laws flip flop every year…